7 Best SOAX Alternatives

Having evolved from being mainly a residential and mobile proxy provider into a broader web data extraction platform, SOAX is now combining proxy access with scraping and data-collection tools. That gives users more under one roof, but it also means the service and its pricing model are increasingly geared towards teams buying bandwidth for data-heavy operations rather than users simply looking for cost-effective proxy access.

In other words, you can run into a brick wall when a fairly capable proxy provider can still be the wrong fit for a particular job. By way of example, the traffic-based pricing of SOAX means the bill grows with the number of gigabytes you use to which you’d say it is a less attractive choice while running browser profiles, managing multiple accounts, or using mobile proxies for hours at a time. 

So, obviously, there are practical reasons to look for SOAX alternatives as you may well want a lower starting price, dedicated mobile proxies, static ISP addresses, longer-lived sessions, or additional tools for the account and identity side of your workflow.

In this guide, we compare the best SOAX alternatives by proxy type, pricing, traffic limits, targeting, session control and real-world use case, including options that make more sense for residential traffic, mobile proxies, scraping and multi-account work.

TL;DR

• The best alternatives to SOAX are CyberYozh App, Decodo, Oxylabs, Bright Data, Webshare, IPRoyal and DataImpulse

• The main reasons users look for an alternative to SOAX are bandwidth-based pricing, limited options for unlimited-traffic workflows, need for static ISP or dedicated mobile proxies, and additional account-management tools.

• CyberYozh App is the strongest fit for: multi-account workflows, browser automation, social media management, cloud phones and users who need unlimited mobile or ISP traffic options, clean IPs, antidetect browser support, and account-verification tools bundled together at a lower entry price for smaller teams or startups

• Oxylabs and Bright Data are better suited for: enterprise teams that need large-scale scraping infrastructure, datasets and advanced web-data solutions.

What is SOAX?

SOAX is a proxy and web data extraction provider offering access to residential and mobile proxy networks alongside tools for collecting public web data. 

SOAX also offers targeting and session controls. Residential and mobile connections can be filtered by country, region, city and ASN/ISP, while users can choose between rotating IPs and sticky sessions when a task needs to retain the same address. HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 are supported.

SOAX uses a traffic-based pricing model, so costs increase as bandwidth usage grows. That can work well for predictable scraping, but it becomes less attractive for bandwidth-heavy browser sessions or multiple mobile connections running throughout the day.

So if you need precise geo-targeting and granular control over proxy sessions, SOAX could come handy, but users whose priorities are unlimited traffic, dedicated connections or lower-cost persistent proxy use may find the trade-off less compelling.

Why do users look for SOAX alternatives?

Looking for an alternative to SOAX doesn’t necessarily mean there is something fundamentally wrong with the service. More often, the darn mismatch appears when session behaviour, the available proxy types or pricing are put against a particular workload. A setup that makes sense for structured web scraping may simply not float your boat when dozens of browser profiles are running all day or an account needs to hold the same connection for an extended period.

Some users want longer or more predictable sticky sessions

Sticky sessions matter when changing an IP halfway through a task could look suspicious to the destination platform. Logging into an account from one address and suddenly continuing from another is prone to triggering additional verification, invalidate a session or contribute to an account being flagged.

SOAX provides configurable session controls, but there have been recent customer reports of IPs changing unexpectedly despite sticky-session settings. One April 2026 Trustpilot reviewer reported changes after only several seconds, while another July review complained about unexpectedly fast rotation. SOAX has responded that rotation should follow the selected session settings and that the reported behaviour required investigation. These are individual customer experiences rather than evidence of a network-wide problem, but they are worth considering when long-lived IP continuity is critical to the job.

If losing the IP means losing the account session along with it, test sticky-session behaviour before committing significant traffic or moving production workloads across.

Some users need static ISP or dedicated mobile proxies

SOAX's residential and mobile networks make sense when access to a large rotating pool is the priority. Not every proxy job benefits from rotation, though.

A static residential ISP proxy gives you an address associated with an ISP while allowing the same IP to remain in place, which can be a better fit for persistent accounts and browser profiles. A dedicated mobile proxy serves a different purpose again: rather than drawing addresses from a shared rotating pool, the connection is reserved for one customer, giving them considerably more control over its use and history.

Users running long-term social accounts, advertising profiles, anti-detect browsers or cloud phones may therefore care less about having millions of potential addresses and more about having one suitable address that stays put. In these cases, SOAX alternatives offering static ISP, dedicated mobile or unlimited-traffic mobile plans deserve a closer look.

Some workflows need more than proxies

A proxy changes the network identity presented to a website, but that is only one part of many account-based workflows. Creating and maintaining accounts can also involve SMS verification, phone and IP risk checks, card risk checks, virtual cards and cloud-phone environments.

Buying each component separately is perfectly workable, but it adds more providers, balances, APIs and dashboards to keep track of. For teams operating large numbers of accounts, that faff eventually becomes an operational cost of its own.

This is where some SOAX alternatives take a different route. Rather than competing purely on pool size or price per gigabyte, they combine proxy infrastructure with tools used elsewhere in the same workflow. That distinction matters if the goal is not simply to collect web data, but to build and maintain persistent online identities at scale.

Per-GB pricing can become expensive for bandwidth-heavy workflows

Paying for traffic is fairly easy to account for when a scraper is collecting lightweight HTML or structured data. The maths begins to change when the proxy is carrying full browser sessions, images, video and other heavier resources.

That matters for browser automation, social media management, cloud phones and multi-account workflows, where profiles may remain active for hours rather than making a short series of requests. The same applies to account management involving media uploads or downloads. Every additional gigabyte consumes more of a metered allowance, and bandwidth that looked ample on paper can disappear surprisingly quickly once real browsers get involved.

For these jobs, it is worth comparing the total monthly cost of metered traffic against providers offering unlimited-traffic mobile or static proxy plans. Per-GB pricing is not inherently worse; it is simply a poor yardstick for value when bandwidth consumption is high or difficult to predict.

Higher entry cost

SOAX's lowest paid plan currently starts at $200 per month + VAT. The free Sandbox tier gives users a way into the platform, but it does not include credits; the $200 Builder plan is the first paid subscription and includes 200 credits. For a team already moving enough proxy traffic, that commitment may be perfectly workable. For a smaller project that needs a few gigabytes or several proxies, however, paying $200 before getting properly under way can be a fair bit more than the job calls for.

7 Best SOAX alternatives in 2026

1. CyberYozh App

CyberYozh App differs from SOAX most clearly in how its proxy products are packaged. Instead of relying entirely on bandwidth-based pricing, it offers unlimited-traffic mobile, static ISP and datacentre options alongside rotating residential proxies billed by the gigabyte. That distinction matters less for a scraper making lightweight requests, but considerably more once full browsers, social accounts or cloud phones are running for hours at a time.

The current all-in-one identity proxy line-up includes:

• Dedicated LTE/5G mobile proxy with unlimited traffic

• Static residential ISP proxy with unlimited traffic

• Shared mobile proxies with unlimited traffic

• Rotating residential proxies with access to 100M residential IPs across 195+ countries and a traffic roll-over feature that allows you to to carry over your unused traffic from one billing cycle to the next rather than losing it

• HTTP/HTTPS and SOCKS5 support, plus API access for automation

• 24-hour sticky sessions

• OS-level fingerprint switching (Windows, Android, macOS/iOS) bundled with fraud-risk checks for multi-account workflows

• SMS verification, virtual numbers, virtual cards and IP, phone and payment-data risk checking within the wider CyberYozh App ecosystem with card payments and support for 16+ cryptocurrencies

• Crypto trading, DeFi interactions, mining, NFT management, decentralized application development, and many more potentially profitable activities in the desired geo, automate rotation and Web3 activities 

• Best full API access and compatibility with anti-detect browsers and automation tools such as Selenium, Playwright, Puppeteer, Scrapy and Postman

• Most budget-friendly option and user-friendly dashboard with 7-language support

CyberYozh App also leans more heavily into the account-management side of proxy use. A team working with anti-detect browsers or cloud phones, such as GeeLark, GoLogin, Octo Browser or AdsPower may need a mobile or ISP address first, then a number for SMS verification, a risk check before using an IP, and sometimes a virtual card for the account itself. Having those tools in the same ecosystem cuts down on the number of separate services involved in the workflow.

In a nutshell, CyberYozh App stands out when it comes down to multi-accounting, browser automation, social media workflows, cloud phones and users who do not want mobile bandwidth metering.

2. Decodo

Decodo combines proxy infrastructure with managed scraping tools, making it a suitable option for teams that want to collect web data without building every part of the scraping stack themselves. Its offering covers residential, mobile, ISP and datacenter proxies alongside scraping APIs and site-unblocking tools.

• Large residential and mobile proxy networks across multiple locations

• Residential, mobile, ISP and datacenter proxies available under one platform

• Scraping APIs and site-unblocking tools for teams that need more than raw proxy access

• Country, city and ASN targeting for location-specific data collection

• Flexible purchasing options that can suit smaller teams testing proxy requirements

• Metered traffic model, with costs increasing as usage grows

3. Oxylabs

Oxylabs is positioned more towards enterprise data collection than general-purpose proxy access. Its platform combines large-scale proxy networks with managed scraping solutions, including APIs for SERP data, eCommerce data, web scraping and a Web Unblocker product designed to handle complex websites and anti-bot systems.

The provider is known for its large proxy infrastructure, with residential, mobile, ISP and datacenter proxies available for different data collection requirements. It also places significant focus on compliance, including ethical sourcing practices, security standards and enterprise support processes, which can be important for companies collecting data at scale or operating in regulated industries.

• Large proxy network covering residential, mobile, ISP and datacentre proxies

• Managed scraping APIs for SERP, eCommerce and general web data collection

• Web Unblocker technology designed for websites with advanced anti-bot protection

• Enterprise-focused infrastructure with dedicated support and compliance processes

• Strong performance benchmarks for large-scale scraping workloads

• Advanced targeting options for location-specific data collection

It’s worth mentioning that Oxylabs is not designed to be a SOAX alternative. Its pricing and product structure are built around enterprise use cases, which can make it difficult to justify for smaller teams, individual projects or workflows where unlimited mobile traffic and lower entry costs matter more.

Read more about the best Oxylabs alternatives.  

4. Bright Data

Bright Data is built around a broader web-data infrastructure model rather than being only a proxy provider. Alongside residential, mobile, ISP and datacentre proxies, it offers managed scraping tools, datasets, browser infrastructure and data collection solutions designed for companies that need to collect, process and use large volumes of public web data.

Its ecosystem is aimed at teams that need more than access to IP addresses. Businesses can use ready-made datasets, scraping APIs and browser-based tools to handle parts of the collection process, while its proxy network provides extensive geographic coverage and targeting options for complex data projects.

• Broad web-data ecosystem combining proxies, scraping tools, datasets and browser infrastructure

• Large proxy network covering residential, mobile, ISP and datacentre connections

• Managed scraping solutions for SERP, eCommerce, market research and other data collection tasks

• Ready-made datasets for teams that prefer accessing structured information rather than building extraction systems

• Advanced targeting and infrastructure controls for large-scale projects

• Strong focus on compliance and responsible data collection, including business verification and network sourcing practices

5. Webshare

Webshare takes a simpler approach compared with providers built around large-scale web data extraction. Its focus is on providing accessible proxy infrastructure through a self-service platform, making it a possible fit for users who need straightforward residential, ISP and datacentre proxies without committing to a broader scraping ecosystem.

The service offers rotating residential proxies alongside static residential and datacentre options, with targeting features designed around common proxy use cases such as market research, automation and data collection. Its lower entry barrier can make it easier for individuals, developers and smaller teams to test proxy workflows before moving into larger plans.

• Self-service proxy platform with residential, static residential, ISP and datacentre options

• Lower entry barrier compared with enterprise-focused proxy providers

• Simple proxy management for developers and smaller teams

• Rotating and static proxy options for different automation and data collection needs

• Traffic-based pricing model that can suit lighter workloads

• API access and developer-focused tools for integrating proxies into workflows

Webshare is better suited to users who need a simpler proxy setup without the additional complexity of an enterprise data platform, therefore, teams collecting large volumes of localised web data may prefer SOAX's broader targeting options and more extensive scraping-focused features.

6. IPRoyal

IPRoyal is a proxy provider that sits between budget-friendly self-service platforms and larger enterprise-focused networks. Its residential proxies are often considered by users who need flexible purchasing options, longer-lasting sessions and a straightforward way to access residential IPs without committing to a large-scale data collection platform.

One of IPRoyal’s notable advantages is its approach to residential traffic. Users can purchase traffic without the same type of enterprise commitment required by some larger providers, and its residential bandwidth does not expire, which can be useful for projects where usage is inconsistent rather than continuous.

• Residential, ISP, mobile and datacentre proxies for different automation and data collection needs

• Flexible residential traffic options with non-expiring bandwidth

• Sticky sessions designed for workflows where maintaining the same IP matters

• No heavy enterprise commitment, making it accessible for smaller teams and individual projects

• Multiple proxy types available from one provider

• Simple self-service setup without the complexity of larger data platforms

7. DataImpulse

DataImpulse focuses on keeping proxy access simple and cost-effective, making it an option for users who need residential and mobile proxies without committing to a large monthly plan. Its pay-as-you-go model allows customers to purchase traffic as needed, which can be useful for smaller projects or workflows where proxy consumption is difficult to predict.

• Pay-as-you-go pricing model without a large monthly commitment

• Residential, mobile and datacentre proxies available for different workflows

• Country-based geographic targeting, with additional targeting options available depending on the plan

• Simple proxy setup suitable for developers and smaller teams

• Flexible traffic usage without requiring long-term subscriptions

• API access and standard proxy protocols for integration into automation tools

Why businesses choose CyberYozh APP instead of SOAX

SOAX is built primarily around proxy access for web data collection, with a strong focus on geo-targeting and scraping workflows. CyberYozh takes a different approach by combining proxy infrastructure with tools designed for workflows where the proxy is only one part of the setup. For teams managing accounts, running browser automation or working with mobile environments, the cost and reliability of the connection, like 24-hour sticky sessions, often matter just as much as the size of the IP pool.

Here are the main reasons businesses choose CyberYozh as a SOAX alternative:

Unlimited traffic options for mobile and ISP workflows

SOAX's traffic-based pricing doesn’t work too bad when proxy usage is predictable and mainly tied to scraping requests. However, browser-based workflows can consume significantly more bandwidth than expected.

CyberYozh App offers selected mobile and ISP proxy products with unlimited traffic, which can make costs easier to forecast for workflows involving long-running browser sessions, cloud phones, automation tools or multiple account profiles.

Dedicated and shared mobile proxy options

Different workflows require different levels of control. Some users need a dedicated mobile connection assigned only to them, while others prefer a more cost-effective shared option.

CyberYozh App provides both dedicated and shared mobile proxies, allowing teams to choose based on the level of control, budget and account requirements they have.

Lower entry point for smaller workflows

Not every proxy project starts with enterprise-level traffic requirements. A small automation workflow, a few browser profiles or a testing environment often needs access to reliable infrastructure without a large upfront commitment.

CyberYozh App offers smaller starting options across several proxy types, making it easier to test and scale gradually.

Proxy infrastructure combined with identity tools

For account-based workflows, the proxy is only one part of the process. Teams may also need phone numbers, SMS verification, IP reputation checks, phone risk checks or virtual payment solutions.

CyberYozh App combines these tools within the same ecosystem, reducing the need to manage multiple providers for different parts of the workflow.

Better fit for anti-detect browsers and account management

SOAX is particularly suited to data collection and scraping scenarios. CyberYozh App is often a better fit for users whose workflows involve maintaining online identities across multiple environments.

This includes use cases involving:

• anti-detect browsers

• social media accounts

• marketplace accounts

• advertising profiles

• cloud phone environments

• browser automation

Static ISP proxies for long-lived connections

Some workflows do not benefit from constantly changing IP addresses. They require a connection that remains stable over time.

CyberYozh App offers static ISP proxies designed for cases where keeping a consistent connection is more important than rotating through a large pool of addresses.

API access and automation support

For developers and technical teams, proxy infrastructure needs to integrate into existing workflows.

CyberYozh App supports API access and common proxy protocols, allowing teams to connect proxies with automation frameworks and internal systems.

Crypto payment support

CyberYozh App supports cryptocurrency payments, giving users another payment option alongside traditional methods. This can be useful for customers who prefer managing infrastructure purchases through digital assets.

User Reviews and Customer Experience

Features and pricing explain what a proxy provider offers, but customer feedback often shows what using the service actually feels like day to day.

Based on the current Trustpilot comparison, CyberYozh App has a 4.7 rating from 210 reviews, with 196 reviews submitted in the last 12 months, while SOAX has a 3.4 rating from 149 reviews, with 12 reviews submitted in the same period. Review volume and ratings are only one part of the picture, but they provide another signal when comparing providers.

CyberYozh reviews frequently mention responsive support, stable connections and the convenience of having proxy services alongside other account-related tools in one ecosystem. For teams running automation workflows, small details such as getting help quickly when a connection behaves unexpectedly can matter just as much as the technical specifications on a pricing page.