Proxies for Facebook, Google, and Telegram: what to choose in 2025

Platforms today are smarter than ever. Facebook, Google, and Telegram work with automated algorithms that analyze not only IP addresses, but also every movement on the screen, every browser “fingerprint,” and every chain of activity. This means that a ban is no longer a punishment for a suspicious IP address, but a reaction to a false trail: too frequent logins, repeated session parameters, connections between accounts for no apparent reason. In such conditions, simply changing the proxy is not a solution, but only part of the solution.

But along with the tightening of automatic checks, the proxy market is evolving: mobile SIM-IP pools are appearing, provider transparency is increasing, the share of ISP proxies is growing, and, most importantly, the demand for proven infrastructure solutions, rather than just “IP sets,” is growing. What do you need to know in 2025 to avoid overpaying for blocked accounts and wasting time on recovery?

### Proxies as a strategic tool, not just a “cover”

Proxy types are nothing new: residential, mobile, ISP, data center. But if the argument used to be “whatever is cheaper,” today it is more important to ask “whatever is safer.” Residential and mobile IPs look as plausible as possible during registration and the account warm-up period — because that's exactly what they are. ISP proxies are a compromise: slightly more expensive than data center proxies, but noticeably more stable. Data center proxies remain a useful tool for auxiliary tasks: monitoring, scraping, testing creatives — but they are completely unsuitable for long-term account management.

Telegram is a special case. MTProto proxies are native, optimized for performance, and especially important when working with bots and bypassing blocks. SOCKS5 is versatile and convenient when you need to integrate with external software, such as those already working with APIs. The extra premium of MTProto is not always critical if the task is simple, but depending on the scenario (bots, channels, bypassing restrictions), the choice can make a big difference.

### Why one domain and an inexpensive data center are no longer enough

Here's what's really scary: banks don't ban IPs, they ban atypical behavior. If IPs change but there is no fingerprint, the connection between accounts remains obvious. This includes cookie history, canvas prints, and click timings. Anti-detection browsers, separate profiles, and environment isolation — without these, even the most expensive residential proxy will not work.

Now imagine: Mark, an arbitrageur from the CIS, struggled for a month with frequent Business Manager account blocks. He chose cheap data center proxies, “saved” on anti-detection and warm-up, and as a result, each shutdown cost him double the price: ban → account restart → loss of time and money. When he decided to change tactics — he took residential and ISP proxies, warmed them up correctly, isolated sessions, and saw that the percentage of ad rejections fell by half, campaigns became more stable, and ROI grew by more than 30%. Moreover, what used to be “expensive” (resident IPs) turned out to be more economical due to less downtime. This is impressive and makes you rethink your ideas.

### How to choose a proxy provider if you need real results

Professionals have stopped choosing proxies “by clicking the ‘Buy’ button” — they compare providers based on three criteria: IP origin, infrastructure, and transparency. He started with a trial pool — 50 residential, 20 mobile, and 20 data centers. Then he conducted a seven-day “simulation”: registration, warming up in anti-detection, launching a test campaign, and monitoring. He recorded latency, CAPTCHA rate, percentage of accepted ads, and average downtime as metrics.

This approach allows you to see whether IPs really look “human,” how they “hold up” under load, and what delays they cause. In addition, the question “where do you get your IPs?” forces the provider to be honest and transparent: SIM routers, partner ISPs, P2P peer-to-peer networks — these are important. For example, it suddenly turned out that one popular provider of residential IP pools is actually a P2P network where some of other people's devices are used without explicit permission. The incidents of 2024 prove that such IPs can be revoked at any time, resulting in mass blocking.

### Real-life examples: actual scenarios and their outcomes**:**

**Stable Business Manager**

An arbitrage trader who managed dozens of BM accounts encountered freezes and bans one after another. After switching to a stack of residential and ISP proxies, warming up isolated profiles, and tracking fingerprint parameters, the percentage of canceled ads fell from 30% to 8% — for him, this meant a return on his campaign investments and the opportunity to scale up. Simply because now the registration agents looked like real users.

**Telegram bots under pressure from blocks**

Another specialist in the field launched 100 bots in Telegram channels in a country with a high level of blocking. It turned out that using SOCKS5 alone significantly reduced connection stability, especially at peak times. When he added MTProto proxies for publishing and internal operations, leaving SOCKS5 only for API and reporting, message loss decreased by 50%, bots became more stable, and it became possible to actually scale the infrastructure rather than restore it.

Both cases illustrate a simple principle: a proxy is not just a network, it is infrastructure and trust.

### Advantages of App Cyber Yozh in 2025

It is important not only to have a proxy, but to have a stack: resident, mobile, and ISP pools, transparent routes, load testing, and minimal risk. This is exactly the approach offered by App Cyber Yozh — a platform where you can get several types of proxies, with API management and a trial period option. Mobile (LTE/4G/5G), residential, and data center IPs are available together, allowing you to build a hybrid architecture: mobile for verification and warm-up, resident for continuous operation, and data center for auxiliary tasks.

If you have a trial, use it for a quick A/B test: residential vs. ISP, with warm-up and launch of a test campaign, and compare CAPTCHA rates, deviations, and downtime. These results speak for themselves.

### Key points for 2025

A simple mass IP change has long since ceased to be a solution. Proxies are part of an organic chain: fingerprint management, payment systems, isolated profiles, behavioral signals. Choose a provider not based on the “IP package” or price, but on flexibility, transparency, and infrastructure. “Cheaper” can turn out to be more expensive if it leads to a restart and loss of traffic.

If you want to check how stable your stack is, start small: try App Cyber Yozh's trial pool, run a 7-day test on registrations, warm-ups, and launches. Compare metrics — latency, CAPTCHA rate, % of successful ads, downtime. And then move on.

In 2025, security systems have become smarter, platforms control activity more strictly, and the risks of blocking have increased. But solutions have also improved: high-quality mobile and ISP proxies have appeared, providers' work has become more transparent, API management has been added, and more attention is paid to legality. Success comes to those who invest not just in a set of IP addresses, but in a reliable infrastructure. Want to secure your campaigns and find out which proxies really work? Start with simple but effective testing of different options. We are ready to help with preparing a request, a comparison table, and performance indicators. Just write to us, and we'll get started.
For added protection, we recommend using <a href="https://app.cyberyozh.com/reception-sms/" target="_blank">anonymous number rental</a> for receiving SMS messages and activation. This will provide additional privacy and protection against data leaks.